I'm so very glad that you seem to be solidly getting-better!
Does Deenan define what he means by socialism?
And is failure evaluated against an implicit standard in which the standard guarantees "good results" regardless what humans operating within it do, which seems to be the usual thing?
no subject
Date: 2019-01-25 01:52 pm (UTC)Does Deenan define what he means by socialism?
And is failure evaluated against an implicit standard in which the standard guarantees "good results" regardless what humans operating within it do, which seems to be the usual thing?