(no subject)
Jan. 24th, 2019 08:05 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
randomdreamsI'm still coughing but I no longer sound like I have tuberculosis, so there's that.
Today I got up and drove through a blizzard to get a cracked filling replaced by a crown. My dentist is extremely quiet unless I start talking about cars, and then he lights right up.
I now have a very delicate temporary crown.
Work is the same as it has been. Once my profit sharing bonus is actually deposited in my bank account, in two weeks, I'm going to start actively looking for another job. I love my coworkers. There have been times where I enjoyed my job itself. But I'm really frustrated with my manager. Our division manager just got rid of the other objectionable manager, and it's possible if I waited long enough he'd do the same here.
My old car is going away as soon as I call a donation place, during work hours, with the title in front of me, a concatenation of events that I have not yet managed to coordinate. Tomorrow morning!
I was looking at Obama's book list and seeing a bunch of very interesting-looking books, so: "Why Liberalism Failed" by Patrick Deenan.
I have to start out with some explanation. He feels that there were three major political experiments of the 1800s and 1900's: liberalism, fascism, and socialism. He also feels the latter two definitively failed, and he feels the first one is now failing. So when he says liberalism, think representative democracy with an emphasis on personal freedom.
And, really, I think he has a love/hate relationship with personal freedom. He seems to be very big on tradition and values and thinks that a culture where people can just, well, decide what gender they find attractive or what gender they are, is Way Too Free and the doorway to ruin. I don't feel that he acknowledges that the traditions and values he thinks are so amazing, are arbitrary constructs that he likes, and a lot of the stuff that makes him feel our society is falling apart aren't actually decisions but realizations.
Some of his critique of late-stage capitalism is good, and relevant. But it's hard to dig out when it's so deeply embedded in a rejection of anything other than nostalgia for a time when everyone was a white anglo saxon protestant, or at least everyone worth mentioning.
So, onto something a lot more fun: "the curious incident of the dog in the night time" by mark haddon. (The original is all in lower case too.)
This was somewhat wrenching to read. It's excellent. The conceit of the innocent kid, who in telling a simple story, conveys a vastly more complex story to the reader, is an old one. This has more than a touch of To Kill A Mockingbird. But it's sophisticated and hard-edged, with no hint of sentimentality. I felt just terrible for every person in the entire book and what they went through.
Today I got up and drove through a blizzard to get a cracked filling replaced by a crown. My dentist is extremely quiet unless I start talking about cars, and then he lights right up.
I now have a very delicate temporary crown.
Work is the same as it has been. Once my profit sharing bonus is actually deposited in my bank account, in two weeks, I'm going to start actively looking for another job. I love my coworkers. There have been times where I enjoyed my job itself. But I'm really frustrated with my manager. Our division manager just got rid of the other objectionable manager, and it's possible if I waited long enough he'd do the same here.
My old car is going away as soon as I call a donation place, during work hours, with the title in front of me, a concatenation of events that I have not yet managed to coordinate. Tomorrow morning!
I was looking at Obama's book list and seeing a bunch of very interesting-looking books, so: "Why Liberalism Failed" by Patrick Deenan.
I have to start out with some explanation. He feels that there were three major political experiments of the 1800s and 1900's: liberalism, fascism, and socialism. He also feels the latter two definitively failed, and he feels the first one is now failing. So when he says liberalism, think representative democracy with an emphasis on personal freedom.
And, really, I think he has a love/hate relationship with personal freedom. He seems to be very big on tradition and values and thinks that a culture where people can just, well, decide what gender they find attractive or what gender they are, is Way Too Free and the doorway to ruin. I don't feel that he acknowledges that the traditions and values he thinks are so amazing, are arbitrary constructs that he likes, and a lot of the stuff that makes him feel our society is falling apart aren't actually decisions but realizations.
Some of his critique of late-stage capitalism is good, and relevant. But it's hard to dig out when it's so deeply embedded in a rejection of anything other than nostalgia for a time when everyone was a white anglo saxon protestant, or at least everyone worth mentioning.
So, onto something a lot more fun: "the curious incident of the dog in the night time" by mark haddon. (The original is all in lower case too.)
This was somewhat wrenching to read. It's excellent. The conceit of the innocent kid, who in telling a simple story, conveys a vastly more complex story to the reader, is an old one. This has more than a touch of To Kill A Mockingbird. But it's sophisticated and hard-edged, with no hint of sentimentality. I felt just terrible for every person in the entire book and what they went through.
no subject
Date: 2019-01-26 05:51 am (UTC)